Wronke v. Madigan

26 F. Supp. 2d 1102 (1998)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Wronke v. Madigan

United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois
26 F. Supp. 2d 1102 (1998)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

In 1990, a court judgment was entered dissolving the marriage between Kenneth Wronke (plaintiff) and his former wife. In 1991, the state court entered an order regarding childcare issues and requiring Wronke to pay child support for his two minor children. By 1995, Wronke had incurred child-support arrearages of $44,226, despite having the ability to pay. Wronke had also placed the names of his children on a sign along a state highway. In October 1995, the state court found Wronke in indirect civil contempt and ordered him incarcerated in county jail until he purged himself of the contempt order by paying child support and effectuating a removal of his children’s names from the sign. The court’s civil-contempt order was affirmed on appeal. In July 1996, Wronke filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in Illinois district court, challenging his incarceration by the state (defendant) without a jury trial for more than six months. Wronke compared his situation to that of a criminal contemnor, who, under the law at the time, could not be imprisoned for more than six months without a jury trial.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (McCuskey, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership