Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Wyatt v. Fulrath

Court of Appeals of New York
211 N.E.2d 637 (1965)


Facts

The Duke and Duchess of Arion were Spanish nationals and domiciliaries. During a period of domestic turbulence in Spain, they placed money and securities in New York banks for safekeeping. In establishing joint and separate accounts, they signed paperwork supplied by the banks in which they agreed that New York survivorship law would apply to their accounts. They never visited New York and did not execute the depository agreements there. The Duke died in 1957. The Duchess died in 1959. The value of the property deposited in New York during their marriage was approximately $2,275,000. Under New York law, the property was considered community property that went, in its entirety, to the Duchess upon her husband’s death. Under Spanish law, community property could not be transferred in its entirety to a surviving spouse. Instead, the surviving spouse was entitled only to half; other heirs of the deceased spouse were entitled to most or all of the other half. Inzer Wyatt (plaintiff), an administrator of the Duke, sued Logan Fulrath (defendant), executor of the Duchess’s will, in a New York court, claiming title to half of the New York property.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Bergan, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Desmond, C.J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.