Wyeth, Inc. v. Weeks
Supreme Court of Alabama
159 So.3d 649 (2014)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Danny Weeks (plaintiff) used a generic version of the prescription drug metoclopramide and allegedly suffered injury from such use. Weeks sued Wyeth, Inc., et al. (defendants), the brand name manufacturers of the drug, in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama. Weeks asserted that the defendants misrepresented facts about metoclopramide to his doctor. Weeks admitted that the defendants did not manufacture the generic version of the drug, which he took. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that they cannot be held liable for injury caused by a product that they did not manufacture. The district court certified this question for the Supreme Court of Alabama.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bolin, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.