Wyke v. Polk County School Board

129 F.3d 560 (1997)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Wyke v. Polk County School Board

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
129 F.3d 560 (1997)

Facts

Shawn Wyke was a 13-year-old student in a Polk County public school (school). During one school day, another student at the school walked in on Shawn attempting to hang himself in a school restroom with a football jersey. The other student left the restroom with Shawn. When the other student got home, he told his mother about the incident. The mother called the school’s dean of students, who told her he would take care of the matter. The dean counseled Shawn in his office but did not call Shawn’s mother to report the incident. On another school day, a custodian noticed that Shawn, whom she did not know, was taking an unusually long time to return from the restroom. When the custodian went to check on Shawn, Shawn left the restroom and commented that had he stayed in the restroom any longer, he would have killed himself. The custodian reported to the vice principal that a student had spoken to her about killing himself, but the vice principal did not act on the information. In the days following these events, Shawn committed suicide. Shawn’s mother, Carol Wyke (plaintiff), sued the Polk County School Board (school board) (defendant) under several theories of liability. Among other claims, Carol brought a state-law negligence claim, arguing that the school had a duty to notify her of her son’s suicide attempts and that the school’s failure to do so was causally related to Shawn’s death. The trial court allowed the negligence claim to go to a jury, which found the school board to be liable. On this issue, the school board appealed, arguing that the district court should have found, as a matter of law, that the district had no duty to notify Carol of Shawn’s suicide attempts.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Fay, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership