Wythe County Community Hospital v. Turpin
Virginia Court of Appeals
2011 Va. App. LEXIS 299 (2011)
- Written by Serena Lipski, JD
Facts
Donna Turpin (plaintiff) worked as a hospice nurse for Wythe County Community Hospital (Wythe) (defendant). Turpin was on call during the weekends. Turpin kept her nursing supplies in her car because she often drove to her patients’ homes, which involved driving on mountainous roads. While Turpin was on call, Wythe would contact her using a pager, which was somewhat unreliable. Wythe would also sometimes contact Turpin through her personal cell phone. Turpin did not regularly carry her cell phone unless she was on call, and her family and friends had been instructed not to call her cell phone on weekends when she was on call. If Wythe called Turpin while she was driving, she would pull over as soon as she could so that she could answer the call. While driving home on a mountainous road from a mandatory in-service at the hospice office on November 7, 2009, Turpin noticed her cell phone light up. Turpin was on call at the time, and she believed that she was likely receiving a call from Wythe. Turpin took her eyes off the road for a few seconds to see if Wythe was calling, and she slid on some gravel and lost control of her vehicle, crashing into a bank on the other side of the road. Later, it was discovered that Wythe had not been calling at the time of Turpin’s accident. Turpin filed a claim for workers’-compensation benefits. The deputy commissioner allowed Turpin’s claim, and the commission affirmed. Wythe appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (McCullough, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.