Ximenes-Lopes v. Brazil
Inter-American Court of Human Rights
Inter-Am. Ct. H.R. (ser. C) No. 149 (2006)

- Written by Katrina Sumner, JD
Facts
Three days after being admitted to a private mental-health clinic, Damiao Ximenes-Lopes (plaintiff) was found by his mother, bleeding, bruised, and filthy with his hands bound. Ximenes-Lopes’s mother alerted the director of the clinic to her son’s condition, but the director did not examine Ximenes-Lopes and simply prescribed medicine for him before the director left the clinic. After a few hours, Ximenes-Lopes died. There was no doctor at the clinic when Ximenes-Lopes died. Ximenes-Lopes was subject to violence and mistreatment by staff and patients alike, which was a common occurrence at the facility. The institution was under contract with Brazil (defendant) for the provision of services to the mentally ill. Ximenes-Lopes’s autopsy revealed trauma possibly resulting from a blunt object or perhaps several bumps and falls. When Ximenes-Lopes’s family was unable to have his death investigated, secure criminal prosecutions, or receive compensation, Ximenes-Lopes’s sister submitted a petition to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (the commission). The commission found that there were multiple violations of the Inter-American Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Persons with Disabilities (the convention). The commission referred the matter to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (the court) to ascertain if Brazil could be held accountable for the violations of the convention, including Ximenes-Lopes’s inhumane treatment and death.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 966,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,007 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,007 law school casebooks.

