From our private database of 35,600+ case briefs...
Yellow Transportation, Inc. v. Michigan
United States Supreme Court
537 U.S. 36 (2002)
In 1965, Congress authorized states to collect fees for each vehicle operated by an interstate transportation company within state borders. Under its reciprocity policy, the State of Michigan (defendant) did not impose registration fees for vehicles registered in states that did not impose fees for Michigan-registered vehicles. As a result, Yellow Transportation, Inc. (Yellow Transportation) (plaintiff) was not required to pay Michigan registration fees for some of its trucks. Congress later passed the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA), 49 U.S.C. § 11506, with the goal of maintaining state revenue flows while reducing the burden on carriers. The ISTEA directed the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) to create a new single-state registration system that minimized costs of compliance by capping per-vehicle fees at the level that each state was charging as of November 15, 1991. To implement the ISTEA, the ICC promulgated regulations that required participating states to cap their fees at the level charged under existing reciprocity agreements. Thereafter, Michigan altered its reciprocity agreement, requiring Yellow Transportation to pay registration fees. Yellow Transportation brought suit against Michigan in the Michigan Court of Claims, arguing that Michigan’s collection of fees violated the ISTEA’s fee-cap provision. The court of claims ruled in Yellow Transportation’s favor, and the court of appeals affirmed. The Michigan Supreme Court reversed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to determine whether Michigan was required to enforce the ICC’s interpretation of the ISTEA’s fee-cap provision.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (O’Connor, J.)
Concurrence (Stevens, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 619,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 619,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.