United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
114 F.3d 879 (1997)
Young (plaintiff) was adopted by her aunt in Hong Kong and allowed to immigrate to the United States based on that adoptive relationship. In 1984, she filed petitions to confer preferential immigration status on her natural siblings under section 203(a)(4) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (INA). The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) approved the petitions and forwarded them to the U.S. consulate in Hong Kong. Young’s siblings applied for visas when they first became available in 1994. The consulate returned the petitions and said that they should not have been granted as Young had no legal relationship to her natural siblings. Young filed an action for declaratory judgment in district court, and the INS revoked three of the four petitions. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the INS. Young then appealed to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Trott, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 218,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.