Zamstein v. Marvasti

692 A.2d 781 (1997)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Zamstein v. Marvasti

Connecticut Supreme Court
692 A.2d 781 (1997)

DC

Facts

In November 1988, Mrs. Zamstein filed for divorce from her husband, Mr. Zamstein (plaintiff). While the divorce petition was pending, Mrs. Zamstein accused Mr. Zamstein of sexually abusing their two children. Mr. Zamstein was arrested for the alleged sexual abuse in September 1989. Shortly thereafter, Mrs. Zamstein retained Dr. Marvasti (defendant), a psychiatrist, to conduct a sexual-abuse evaluation of the children. In March 1990, Marvasti gave an edited videotape of his sessions with the children to the state’s attorney’s office. In January 1991, the Zamsteins’ divorce was finalized and the court awarded joint custody to Mr. and Mrs. Zamstein. Mr. Zamstein was tried in 1991 for the alleged sexual abuse of the children, and Dr. Marvasti testified for the state during the trial. Mr. Zamstein was ultimately acquitted of the charges, and subsequently filed a lawsuit against Dr. Marvasti alleging negligence in Dr. Marvasti’s production of the edited videotape that was used in Mr. Zamstein’s prosecution. The trial court struck Mr. Zamstein’s negligence claims from his petition, and he appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Borden, J.)

Dissent (Berdon, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership