Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District

United States Supreme Court
509 U.S. 1 (1993)


Facts

James Zobrest (plaintiff) was a student in Tucson, Arizona who had been deaf since birth. Zobrest attended a school for the deaf until the sixth grade. From the sixth grade to the eighth grade, Zobrest attended a public school in the Catalina Foothills School District (the district) (defendant). Pursuant to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), the district provided Zobrest with a sign-language interpreter during his enrollment. Zobrest then enrolled in a private, Catholic high school, beginning with the ninth grade, for religious reasons. Zobrest and his parents requested that the district continue to provide him with a sign-language interpreter at the private school. The county attorney determined that providing an interpreter would violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. The Arizona attorney general agreed with the county attorney. The district then declined to provide the interpreter. Zobrest sued the district, claiming that the district’s decision violated his rights under the IDEA and the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment. The district court agreed with the district that providing Zobrest with a sign-language interpreter would violate the Establishment Clause. Zobrest appealed, and court of appeals affirmed the decision. Zobrest then sought review from the United States Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, C.J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.