Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. Aereo, Inc.

United States Supreme Court
134 S. Ct. 2498 (2014)


Aereo, Incorporated (Aereo) (defendant) was an internet-based television subscription service. Aereo charged a subscription fee to its users, and the service allowed users to stream live-broadcast television shows. Subscribers indicated which television show they wanted to watch and then had the option to either view the show as it aired or save it for another time. To accommodate requests, Aereo dedicated one antenna to each subscriber’s request, tuned the antenna to the selected broadcast signal, and stored the received data on a server file dedicated to the requesting subscriber. If more than one subscriber requested a particular broadcast, a separate copy would be created and saved of the show for each subscriber. Aereo was sued for copyright infringement by television producers, broadcasters, and others with copyright interests (content owners) (plaintiffs) in the programs available to Aereo’s subscribers. The district court denied the content owners’ requests for a preliminary injunction, and the decision was affirmed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The content owners petitioned for a writ of certiorari.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.


The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Breyer, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Scalia, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 219,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.