American Campaign Academy v. Commissioner

92 T.C. 1053 (1989)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

American Campaign Academy v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court
92 T.C. 1053 (1989)

Facts

The National Republican Congressional Committee created the American Campaign Academy (academy) (plaintiff) to train individuals for careers as campaign managers and other political-campaign professionals. The academy maintained a regularly scheduled curriculum, faculty, and a full-time enrolled student body. The academy did not train candidates, but rather trained campaign professionals, and did not intervene in campaigns or engage in lobbying activities. The academy’s activities were funded by the National Republican Congressional Trust (NRCT), and most of the academy’s directors had significant ties to the Republican party. The academy did not closely track its students’ activities after graduation, but it appeared that most of the candidates for whom its graduates went on to work were Republican. The commissioner of internal revenue (commissioner) (defendant) denied the academy’s application for tax exemption under § 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. The academy then sought a declaratory judgment that it was entitled to the exemption. The commissioner conceded that the academy was organized exclusively for exempt purposes, that no part of the academy’s net earnings inured to the benefit of a private individual, and that the academy was not engaged in proscribed political or lobbying activities. The commissioner argued, however, that the academy was operated for a substantial nonexempt purpose in that it more than incidentally benefited Republican party candidates and entities and served the private interests of Republican party entities rather than public interests.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Nims, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 804,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership