Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Bateman Eichler, Hill Richards, Inc. v. Berner

United States Supreme Court
472 U.S. 299 (1985)


Facts

Berner (plaintiff) purchased large quantities of over-the-counter stock in T. O. N. M. Oil & Gas Exploration Corporation (TONM) through Charles Lazzaro, a registered securities broker for Bateman Eichler, Hill Richards, Inc. (Bateman) (defendant). Berner admitted that he had purchased TONM stock on the premise that Lazzaro was privy to certain information that was not otherwise generally available. Berner filed an action, alleging that he had incurred substantial losses as a result of a conspiracy between Lazzaro and the president of TONM to induce the sale of TONM stock. Specifically, Berner alleged that Lazzaro claimed to know TONM insiders and to have learned that TONM was engaged in negotiations to form a joint venture in mining Surinamese gold due to the discovery of vast amounts of gold in that area. Lazzaro also claimed that TONM stock would potentially rise from $1.50 per share to $100 per share within a year. Berner claimed that Bateman knew the insider information was false and therefore committed a violation of § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5. In the action, Berner sought capital losses, lost profits, punitive damages, costs, and attorney’s fees. The district court dismissed the action, and Berner appealed. The court of appeals reversed in favor of Berner. Bateman appealed, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Brennan, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.