Bateman Eichler, Hill Richards, Inc. v. Berner
United States Supreme Court
472 U.S. 299, 105 S. Ct. 2622, 86 L. Ed. 2d 215 (1985)
- Written by Eric Maddox, JD
Facts
Berner (plaintiff) purchased large quantities of over-the-counter stock in T. O. N. M. Oil & Gas Exploration Corporation (TONM) through Charles Lazzaro, a registered securities broker for Bateman Eichler, Hill Richards, Inc. (Bateman) (defendant). Berner admitted that he had purchased TONM stock on the premise that Lazzaro was privy to certain information that was not otherwise generally available. Berner filed an action, alleging that he had incurred substantial losses as a result of a conspiracy between Lazzaro and the president of TONM to induce the sale of TONM stock. Specifically, Berner alleged that Lazzaro claimed to know TONM insiders and to have learned that TONM was engaged in negotiations to form a joint venture in mining Surinamese gold due to the discovery of vast amounts of gold in that area. Lazzaro also claimed that TONM stock would potentially rise from $1.50 per share to $100 per share within a year. Berner claimed that Bateman knew the insider information was false and therefore committed a violation of § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5. In the action, Berner sought capital losses, lost profits, punitive damages, costs, and attorney’s fees. The district court dismissed the action, and Berner appealed. The court of appeals reversed in favor of Berner. Bateman appealed, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Brennan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.