Bob Jones University Museum and Gallery v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
71 T.C.M. 3120 (1996)
- Written by Jenny Perry, JD
Facts
Bob Jones University Museum and Gallery (museum) (plaintiff) was formed to operate a museum and art gallery on the campus of Bob Jones University (the university) in South Carolina. Before being separately incorporated, the museum was part of the university. The new entity was created to display the same artwork and planned to retain the same employees as when it was operated by the university. The museum would be housed in the same facilities pursuant to the terms of a written lease with the university. The rent to be paid by the museum to the university was $105,600 annually, which was less than the fair market value of the facilities. In 1983, the United States Supreme Court revoked the university’s tax-exempt status due to the university’s racially discriminatory policies. The newly incorporated museum did not, however, maintain such policies. The museum was open to the public and free of charge, and 80 percent of the museum’s visitors had no affiliation with the university. Most of the museum’s revenue was expected to come from contributions, with a small portion being derived from gift-shop sales. The commissioner of internal revenue (commissioner) (defendant) denied the museum’s application for tax-exempt status under § 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code on the ground that the operation of the museum resulted in substantial private benefit to the nonexempt university and, therefore, the museum’s earnings inured to private shareholders or individuals. The museum sought a declaratory judgment to the effect that it was entitled to the exemption.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Foley, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.