Bonny v. Society of Lloyd’s
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
3 F.3d 156 (1993)
- Written by Eric Maddox, JD
Facts
The Society of Lloyd’s (Lloyd’s) (defendant), which was located in England, was a market somewhat similar to the New York Stock Exchange. Agents of Lloyd’s met with Kenneth Bonny, Francesca Bonny, and Robert Flevig (plaintiffs) in Illinois to discuss investing in Lloyd’s. The Bonnys and Flevig traveled to England and signed a contract entitled General Undertaking for Membership. The agreement contained forum-selection and choice-of-law clauses. Another agreement was signed, stating that all disputes would be arbitrated in England under English law. After suffering large losses, the Bonnys and Flevig sued Lloyd’s, alleging that Lloyd’s had failed to disclose material facts and risk factors as required by the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77a et seq., and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78a et seq. The district court dismissed the claim based on the forum-selection and arbitration clauses that designated England as the forum for litigation. The plaintiffs appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lay, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.