Booker v. Lehigh University
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
800 F. Supp. 234 (1992)
- Written by Jennifer Flinn, JD
Facts
Lehigh University (defendant) adopted a social policy that prohibited the host of any parties held on campus, such as fraternities, from serving alcohol to students under the age of 21, the legal drinking age in Pennsylvania. The social policy also required party hosts to register parties with the university’s student life office and to hire a security guard to check student identification at the party. The social policy and party-registration forms provided that registration of the party did not constitute approval from the university and that the party host, not the university, was responsible for following the social policy rules. The university did not police parties to ensure compliance. Lora Ann Booker (plaintiff) was a 19-year-old sophomore at the university. One night, Booker attended several fraternity parties on campus and consumed large amounts of alcohol. While intoxicated, Booker attempted to walk back to her sorority house by taking a steep, rocky trail when Booker fell and injured her head. Booker suffered a hematoma on her brain and underwent surgery. Booker filed a lawsuit against the university, arguing that the university assumed a duty to protect students from injuries caused by underage drinking by adopting the social policy and that the university breached that duty by failing to enforce compliance by the party hosts. The university filed a motion for summary judgment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Troutman, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.