From our private database of 36,900+ case briefs...
Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., Ltd.
United States Supreme Court
535 U.S. 722 (2002)
Facts
Festo (Plaintiff) owned two patents directed to magnetic conveyor systems, each of which were amended during the patent application process. Festo sued Shoketsu (Defendant) for infringement. Shoketsu argued as a rule that amendments made during patent prosecution which narrowed the scope of the claims barred the application of the doctrine of equivalents to those claims Because Festo had narrowed certain elements of its claims through amendment, Shoketsu argued, the doctrine of equivalents could not be applied those claim elements. The district court found for Shoketsu, which was affirmed by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and then overturned by the United States Supreme Court. On remand, the Federal Circuit en banc ruled against Festo, and the case was again appealed to the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kennedy, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 629,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 36,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.