Goar v. Village of Stephen
Minnesota Supreme Court
196 N.W. 171 (1923)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Minnesota Electric Distributing Company (the company) contracted with the Village of Stephen (the village) (defendants) to reconstruct its electric system. The contract provided that the company warranted its work to be free from defects for one year and that the village assumed the duty of reporting defects to the company. The company installed a transformer with wires too close together near Goar’s (plaintiff’s) home. Over time wind rubbed the wires, which eventually wore through. Approximately eighteen months after the company had completed and the village accepted the work, a high-voltage current discharged into Goar’s home, causing her serious injury. Goar sued and obtained a verdict against both the village and the company. Both appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stone, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.