From our private database of 30,500+ case briefs...
Goar v. Village of Stephen
Minnesota Supreme Court
196 N.W. 171 (1923)
Minnesota Electric Distributing Company (the company) contracted with the Village of Stephen (the village) (defendants) to reconstruct its electric system. The contract provided that the company warranted its work to be free from defects for one year and that the village assumed the duty of reporting defects to the company. The company installed a transformer with wires too close together near Goar’s (plaintiff’s) home. Over time wind rubbed the wires, which eventually wore through. Approximately eighteen months after the company had completed and the village accepted the work, a high-voltage current discharged into Goar’s home, causing her serious injury. Goar sued and obtained a verdict against both the village and the company. Both appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Stone, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 551,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 551,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 30,500 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.