Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 19,800+ case briefs...

Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc.

United States Supreme Court
136 S.Ct. 1923 (2016)


Facts

Halo Electronics, Inc. (Halo) (plaintiff) and Pulse Electronics, Inc. (Pulse) (defendant) both supplied electronic components. Halo brought suit against Pulse, alleging that Pulse infringed upon several of Halo’s patents. The jury found that Pulse had infringed Halo’s patents and that there was a high probability it had done so willfully. The trial court, however, declined to award enhanced damages under § 284 of the Patent Act, after determining that Pulse had presented a defense that was not objectively baseless. Thus, the court concluded, Halo had failed to show objective recklessness under the standard established in In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F. 3d 1360 (2007). The Federal Circuit affirmed this decision. The Supreme Court granted certiorari and consolidated this case with a similar case, Stryker Corp. v. Zimmer Inc., 782 F.3d 649 (2014).

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Roberts, C.J.)

Concurrence (Breyer, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 507,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 507,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 19,800 briefs, keyed to 985 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers


Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial