Rich Rosen Construction Company (Rosen) (defendant) built a home and sold it in 1976. In 1986, James Hershey (plaintiff) was the third buyer to purchase the home. Before the purchase, Hershey performed his own inspection and did not find any unusual defects in the exterior stucco. About a year later, Hershey observed that the stucco was bulging, an issue that continued to worsen. Hershey hired building expert C. Randall Rushing to inspect the stucco. Rushing concluded that the stucco application was very poor and violated building codes. Thereafter, Hershey asked Rosen to repair the stucco, but Rosen refused. Hershey filed suit against Rosen, claiming breach of implied warranty. Rosen contended that Hershey’s claims were barred by the statute of limitations and by Hershey’s failure to make a reasonable inspection of the home before buying. Hershey and Rosen each filed a motion for summary judgment. At the hearing, Rushing testified that if the stucco had been properly applied, the stucco would have been reasonably expected to last from 30 to 50 years. The trial court went on to conclude that (1) the statute of limitations did not bar Hershey’s claim, (2) Hershey had performed a reasonable inspection of the home, and (3) Rosen had breached the implied warranty. The trial court entered judgment in Hershey’s favor. Rosen appealed.