Hollinger International, Inc. v. Black
Delaware Court of Chancery
844 A.2d 1022 (2004)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
Conrad Black (defendant) owned a controlling block of shares in Hollinger International, Inc. (International) (plaintiff). Black and his holding company, Hollinger, Inc., had a long history of double-dealing to advance Black’s own interests at International’s expense. International’s directors increasingly bristled at Black’s underhanded conduct. To mollify the board’s restiveness, Black introduced a restructuring proposal, the centerpiece of which was a strategic process to maximize International’s value for all its shareholders. Shortly after the board approved Black’s proposal, and long before International could complete the strategic process, Black undercut the process by unveiling a plan to sell Hollinger’s stock to the Barclay brothers. The board adopted a shareholder-rights plan intended to deter the Barclay transaction and petitioned the Delaware Court of Chancery for a declaratory judgment that the rights plan was legally valid.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Strine, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
