Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

In re Crawford

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
324 F.3d 539 (2003)


Facts

At the time that Crawford (defendant) filed a Chapter 13 bankruptcy petition, he owed the following debt to nonpriority unsecured creditors (plaintiffs): $19,000 to the IRS, $18,000 to the county on account of Crawford’s delinquency in paying child support, and $500 to two trade creditors. By law, the county debt was nondischargeable. Crawford submitted a repayment plan that designated the creditors into two classes: contingent upon Crawford’s successful settlement of a dispute with the IRS, he would (1) pay the county debt first, in its entirety, over three years and then (2) pay three to six percent of his remaining debts. When Crawford failed to prevail in his IRS dispute, he amended his plan, proposing to pay two-thirds of the county debt and none of his other debts. If Crawford had submitted a plan that did not give preferential treatment to the county debt, all creditors would receive approximately 32 cents on the dollar. The bankruptcy court rejected Crawford’s plan on the grounds that it discriminated unfairly in its classification of creditors. The district court affirmed. Crawford appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Posner, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 201,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.