In re Windsor on the River Associates, Ltd.

7 F.3d 127 (1993)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Windsor on the River Associates, Ltd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
7 F.3d 127 (1993)

Facts

Windsor on the River Associates, Ltd. (Windsor) (debtor) owned an apartment complex in Iowa. Balcor Real Estate Finance, Inc. (Balcor) (creditor) held a $9.35 million note and mortgage on the complex. The note provided for a balloon payment of all the unpaid principle and deferred interest in May 1991. Between March 1991 and May 1991, Windsor tried and failed to negotiate an extension of the loan. Windsor defaulted and filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy before the May maturity date. The bankruptcy court determined that the value of the complex was just over $10 million and that Balcor’s claim was over $9 million. Windsor’s reorganization plan (the plan) recognized three classes of creditors. Class 1 consisted of Balcor’s secured claim. Class 2 was a legal claim of about $60, 000 brought by Mary Niman. Class 3 consisted of $13,000 in unsecured trade debts. Under the plan, Balcor was to receive $500,000 on the plan’s effective date, but the maturity date of the remainder of the debt would be extended 10 years. The payments to the Class 2 and Class 3 creditors were to be made 60 days after the effective date of the plan. According to § 1124(1) of the Bankruptcy Code (code), a creditor’s claims were considered impaired by a plan if the plan altered the creditor’s legal, equitable, or contractual interests. Because full payment to each class was delayed, each class was considered impaired. Under code § 1129(a)(10), a court could confirm a plan if only one class of claims impaired by the plan voted to accept the plan. Balcor believed that Class 2 and Class 3 had been artificially impaired to ensure that at least one impaired class would be crammed down over Balcor’s objections. Balcor successfully challenged the validity of the Class 2 claim, denying Niman the right to vote on the plan. Balcor purchased most of the Class 3 claims as well. However, the bankruptcy court denied Balcor the right to vote as assignee of those claims. The Class 3 claimants voted to approve the plan. The bankruptcy court therefore approved the plan over Balcor’s objections.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Arnold, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership