Johnson v. Jacobs
Indiana Court of Appeals
970 N.E.2d 666 (2011)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
In the midst of a divorce, flight student Eric Johnson crashed a Cessna into his mother-in-law’s house with his eight-year-old daughter aboard. Neither survived. Beth Johnson (plaintiff) sued flight instructor Tony Newbold, the Lawrence County Aviation Board, and the County Commissioners (defendants) for her daughter’s wrongful death. Beth claimed that failing to properly secure the airplane and allowing Johnson to take off without a flight instructor, with a passenger, when he was not qualified or certified, proximately caused the crash. Eric had obtained keys from an employee who recognized him as a flight student with a scheduled flying lesson that day. But instead of taxiing out and waiting for an instructor, Eric took off with his daughter aboard. He called Beth three times during flight, yelling and cursing. Twenty minutes later, two witnesses saw the Cessna approach the airport as if it were going to land, except it had wind at its tail and no landing flaps down. An experienced pilot heard the engine throttle increase, then the plane banked hard and nosed down at 45 degrees into Beth’s mother’s house. The National Transportation Safety Committee ruled suicide the probable cause of the crash. The trial court concluded that Eric’s intentional criminal acts provided superseding intervening cause, severing any causal connection between any alleged negligence and the crash, and granted summary judgment against Beth. Beth appealed, arguing that the trial court erroneously concluded that Eric committed suicide and murdered his daughter, although the crash could have been accidental.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Baker, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.