Krutzfeldt Ranch, LLC v. Pinnacle Bank
Montana Supreme Court
272 P.3d 635 (2012)
- Written by Sharon Feldman, JD
Facts
Pinnacle Bank (Pinnacle) (defendant) agreed to make a loan to William and Julie Krutzfeldt and Krutzfeldt Ranch, LLC (the Krutzfeldts) (plaintiffs). Law firm Crowley Fleck (Crowley) represented Pinnacle in connection with the loan. When Pinnacle refused to disburse funds, Don Harris sued Pinnacle on behalf of the Krutzfeldts. Harris retained Lance Hoskins to provide tax advice. Hoskins met with Harris and the client and sent an engagement letter and a bill. Neither the letter nor the bill indicated Hoskins had withdrawn from the engagement. Hoskins did not respond to a message that he would be needed after settlement discussions. Two weeks later, Harris received a form “Dear Client” letter announcing that Hoskins and his partner had joined Crowley. The letter did not state that the Krutzfeldts were no longer Hoskins’s client. Instead, it indicated that Crowley’s resources would help Hoskins better service clients’ needs. When Harris told Crowley the Krutzfeldts would not consent to or waive the conflict, Crowley said the firm had established an ethical screen to prevent Hoskins from being involved in or receiving a fee from the case. The court denied the Krutzfeldts’ motion to disqualify Crowley from representing Pinnacle. The Krutzfeldts appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Baker, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.