United States Supreme Court
465 U.S. 668 (1984)
Every year during the Christmas holiday season, the City of Pawtucket, Rhode Island (City) builds a large, public Christmas display. The display includes traditional “secular” Christmas images such as Santa Claus and reindeer figures, as well as a religious crèche. The City originally spent public funds to acquire the display, but currently spends nominal costs erecting and maintaining it each year. Donnelly (plaintiff) brought suit against Lynch (defendant), the mayor and the City in federal district court on the ground that the display violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. The district court agreed and held the display unconstitutional, and the court of appeals affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Burger, C.J.)
Concurrence (O’Connor, J.)
Dissent (Brennan, J.)
Dissent (Blackmun, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 237,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.