Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson
United States Supreme Court
477 U.S. 57 (1986)
In 1974, Michelle Vinson (plaintiff) was hired by Sidney Taylor to work at a branch office of Meritor Savings Bank (Meritor) (defendant). Taylor, a Meritor vice president and branch manager, became Vinson’s supervisor. Vinson, by her own merit, was eventually promoted to assistant branch manager. In 1978, Vinson took sick leave and was eventually let go for excessive use of the sick-leave policy. Following her termination, Vinson sued Meritor and Taylor, alleging sex discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. According to Vinson, although her relationship with Taylor was initially strictly professional, Taylor began making unwelcome sexual advances toward Vinson shortly after she was hired. At trial, Vinson testified that she first refused Taylor’s advances, but eventually agreed to engage in sexual intercourse with him because she feared losing her job. Over the course of several years, Vinson and Taylor continued having intercourse; additionally, Vinson testified that Taylor fondled her in front of other employees, exposed himself to her at work, and forcibly raped her several times. Vinson never reported the harassment to Taylor’s supervisors or filed an official complaint with Meritor. Taylor denied the allegations and contended Vinson’s accusations stemmed from a business dispute. The district court concluded that Vinson was not a victim of sex discrimination or sexual harassment, because she did not suffer any economic harm, and any intimate relationship she had with Taylor was voluntary. The court of appeals reversed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.