Norwest Bank Nebraska v. Tveten
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
848 F.2d 871 (1988)
- Written by Denise McGimsey, JD
Facts
Omar Tveten (defendant), a Minnesota physician, became involved in a number of highly leveraged real estate investments that eventually soured. On account of personal guarantees executed by Tveten, he came to owe Norwest Bank Nebraska and other creditors (plaintiffs) close to $19,000,000. Some of the creditors initiated lawsuits against Tveten; in October 1985, one such lawsuit resulted in a $139,657 judgment against Tveten. In January 1986, Tveten filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition. Prior to filing the petition, Tveten consulted with an attorney to prepare for bankruptcy. Through 17 transactions, he converted almost all of his nonexempt property into approximately $700,000 of exempt property by selling or otherwise liquidating the nonexempt property and then transferring the proceeds to life insurance or annuity contracts with the Lutheran Brotherhood, a fraternal organization under Minnesota law. State law shielded from creditors any payments made, in unlimited amount, by a fraternal benefit association. In his bankruptcy filing, Tveten sought to exempt the assets held with the Lutheran Brotherhood and to receive a discharge of $18,920,000 of his debts. The creditors objected. The bankruptcy court denied discharge on the grounds that Tveten had abused the protections of the Bankruptcy Code and had unlawfully intended to hinder and delay his creditors. The district court affirmed. Tveten appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Timbers, J.)
Dissent (Arnold, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 782,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.