Panther Partners Inc. v. Ikanos Communications, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
681 F.3d 114 (2012)
Ikanos Communications Inc. (Ikanos Communications) (defendant) sold very-high-bit-rate digital-subscriber line Version Four chips to Sumitomo Electric and NEC in 2005. Sumitomo Electric and NEC were Ikanos Communications’ two largest customers. In fact, 72 percent of Ikanos Communications’ revenue in 2005 was from sales to Sumitomo Electric and NEC. In January 2006, Ikanos Communications learned that there were problems with the Version Four chips. Ikanos Communications had planned a secondary offering of its stock, but in the weeks leading up to the secondary offering, the problems with the Version Four chips continued to increase. Sumitomo Electric and NEC lodged a large number of complaints, citing that the Version Four chips were failing and that subscribers were losing both internet and telephone connections. Despite these complaints, Ikanos Communications went forward with the secondary offering and sold 5,750,000 shares of stock, some of which was sold to Panther Partners Inc. (Panther Partners) (plaintiff). Three months after the secondary offering, Ikanos Communications agreed at its own expense to replace all Version Four chips sold to Sumitomo Electric and NEC. The next month, Ikanos Communications reported a net loss of $2,200,000, which caused the price of its shares to drop over 25 percent. Panther Partners sued, alleging that Ikanos Communications had failed to disclose the defectiveness of the Version Four chips prior to the secondary offering and that this failure to disclose was a violation of Item 303 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation S-K, 17 C.F.R. § 229.303(a)(3)(ii). The district court dismissed for failure to state a claim, and Panther Partners appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 710,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 710,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.