People v. Christian
California Court of Appeal
48 Cal. Rptr. 2d 867 (1996)
- Written by Sharon Feldman, JD
Facts
Contra Costa County’s public defender’s office (PD) represented indigent criminal defendants in the county. The alternate defender office (ADO) was created in response to the cost of retaining private attorneys in cases in which the PD had a conflict of interest. The ADO was officially a PD branch but operated autonomously and had a different supervising attorney; separate support staff, investigators, offices, keys, and computers; and a separate library, telephone number, and facsimile machine. The PD did not influence how ADO cases were handled and did not have access to ADO client files or confidences. Ron Christian and Dishon Jackson (defendants) were convicted for offenses related to a restaurant robbery. Christian was represented at trial by the PD; Jackson was represented by the ADO. Before and after trial commenced, Jackson moved for substitute counsel, claiming his ADO lawyer had a conflict of interest. Jackson’s motions were denied. On appeal, Jackson argued that he was denied effective assistance of counsel because he and Christian had potential and actual conflicting interests, and the PD in effect represented both Jackson and Christian without obtaining their consent.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kline, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.