People v. Christian

48 Cal. Rptr. 2d 867 (1996)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

People v. Christian

California Court of Appeal
48 Cal. Rptr. 2d 867 (1996)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Contra Costa County’s public defender’s office (PD) represented indigent criminal defendants in the county. The alternate defender office (ADO) was created in response to the cost of retaining private attorneys in cases in which the PD had a conflict of interest. The ADO was officially a PD branch but operated autonomously and had a different supervising attorney; separate support staff, investigators, offices, keys, and computers; and a separate library, telephone number, and facsimile machine. The PD did not influence how ADO cases were handled and did not have access to ADO client files or confidences. Ron Christian and Dishon Jackson (defendants) were convicted for offenses related to a restaurant robbery. Christian was represented at trial by the PD; Jackson was represented by the ADO. Before and after trial commenced, Jackson moved for substitute counsel, claiming his ADO lawyer had a conflict of interest. Jackson’s motions were denied. On appeal, Jackson argued that he was denied effective assistance of counsel because he and Christian had potential and actual conflicting interests, and the PD in effect represented both Jackson and Christian without obtaining their consent.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kline, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership