Quantico Arms and Tactical Supply, Inc.
United States Government Accountability Office
2008 WL 4394896 (2008)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
The United States Marine Corps (Marine Corps) (defendant) issued a Request for Quotations (RFQ) to Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) contractors for a contract to design, manufacture, and supply 120,000 flame-resistant shirts in sizes small, medium, large, extra-large, and XX-large. The RFQ stated that responsive contractors would need to submit two large-size samples for flame-resistance testing. The Marine Corps did not provide dimension specifications for the requested sizes. Before the quotation submission due date, Quantico Arms and Tactical Supply, Inc. (Quantico) (plaintiff) filed a protest with the Government Accountability Office (GAO) arguing that the Marine Corps’ failure to include size specifications in the RFQ impeded Quantico’s ability to prepare a responsive quote and compete on a common basis with other FSS contractors. The Marine Corps countered, arguing that (1) it was more concerned with the flame-retardant properties of the submitted models than the size uniformity; (2) the sizing requirements were adequately stated for a commercial procurement contact under FSS; and (3) the Marine Corps had previously purchased similar shirts from commercial vendors without incident in response to similar RFQs.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kepplinger, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.