This website requires JavaScript. Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings, or use a different web browser like Google Chrome or Safari.

Options

From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...

Siderman De Blake v. Republic of Argentina

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

965 F.2d 699 (1992)

Facts

Siderman De Blake (Siderman) (plaintiff) brought suit against Argentina (defendant) to recover for torture and the wrongful seizure of his property by Argentine authorities. Argentina previously requested the assistance of California state courts in proceedings against Siderman regarding the same transaction upon which Siderman’s action was based. After Siderman and his family fled Argentina, Argentine authorities allegedly modified his deed to property in the State by changing his ownership from 127,000 acres to 127 acres. Argentina listed the remainder of the property as belonging to the State. When Siderman sold property to raise money to flee, Argentina brought a criminal action against him alleging that he fraudulently sold property that was not his. Argentina sought help from the California courts by sending a letter rogatory requesting assistance from the courts in serving process on Siderman, who was then living in Los Angeles, California. Siderman’s own suit against Argentina was based on this conduct, and he alleged that Argentinian authorities wished to compel his return to Argentina to further torture and possibly kill him. In its defense, Argentina argued that Siderman’s suit against it was improper due to its sovereign immunity.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Fletcher, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
The procedural disposition (e.g., reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 616,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.
Unlock this case brief Read our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.
Learn about our approach Read more about Quimbee

Here's why 616,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Here's why 616,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
35,400 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
Uniform format for every case brief
Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
Top-notch customer support