Símon, Julio Héctor and Others re Illegitimate Deprivation of Freedom
Argentina Supreme Court of Justice
Cause No. 17.768c (2005)
- Written by Curtis Parvin, JD
Facts
Julio Héctor Símon (defendant) was a member of the Argentine federal police during a military dictatorship. He was accused and prosecuted for crimes against humanity, including kidnapping, forced disappearance of persons, and torture. Argentina’s legislature passed legislation that would grant amnesty and pardon the accused violators of human-rights laws under the dictatorship. Amnesty laws had been historically used as a means of social pacification. However, under the American Convention on Human Rights—an international treaty ratified by Argentina—and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (the treaties), amnesty laws could not forgive individuals of past grave human-rights abuses through local political processes. The Inter-American Court of Human Rights and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights had provided previous decisions and guidance invalidating such amnesty laws, including in Peru. Símon and others challenged the prosecution, claiming amnesty under Argentine laws. The trial court rejected the amnesty laws as unconstitutional. Símon appealed to the Argentina Supreme Court of Justice.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 826,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 992 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.