St. Louis Science Fiction Limited v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
49 T.C.M 1126 (1985)
- Written by Jenny Perry, JD
Facts
St. Louis Science Fiction Limited (Sci-Fi) (plaintiff) was organized to promote the reading, writing, viewing, and appreciation of the science-fiction and fantasy genres. Sci-Fi’s principal activity was conducting an annual convention in St. Louis. The convention was widely advertised and open to the public. Activities at the 1980 convention included a masquerade party, a pool party, a 24-hour video room, and a 24-hour gaming room. The 1981 convention offered expanded gaming facilities hosting multiple tournaments, a large movie room with two video screens, and a 24-hour hospitality room. Films shown included science-fiction classics like 2001: A Space Odyssey, but most were lighter fare, such as Hardware Wars, a spoof on Star Wars. The conventions also included panel discussions. Again, some involved serious literary or critical topics, but most were recreational in nature. In addition, science-fiction and fantasy artwork were auctioned at the conventions, with Sci-Fi retaining a 15 percent commission on sales. Huckster’s tables, where attendees could sell books and other items, were also available to rent. The commissioner of internal revenue (commissioner) (defendant) denied Sci-Fi’s application for exemption from income taxation, finding that Sci-Fi was operated in furtherance of substantial nonexempt commercial, social, and entertainment purposes. Sci-Fi sought a declaratory judgment to the effect that it was entitled to § 501(c)(3) exemption.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Dawson, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.