Thane International, Inc. v. Trek Bicycle Corp.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
305 F.3d 894 (2002)
- Written by Mike Cicero , JD
Facts
Trek Bicycle Corporation (Trek) (defendant) had manufactured bicycles under the mark “Trek” since 1977 and had used “Trek” on numerous related products, including video and computer games, toys, clothing, and helmets. Surveys published in 1995, 1997, and 1999 editions of Bicycling Magazine heralded Trek as the most popular and respected bicycle brand in the United States. Trek spent between $3 million and $5 million annually on advertising in publications that included Rolling Stone, Men’s Journal, Outside Magazine, and Playboy. Trek also sponsored athletes to use its equipment, most notably Lance Armstrong, who rode Trek bicycles to win several Tour de France titles. Pictures of Armstrong with a Trek bicycle appeared in the New York Times and on Wheaties cereal boxes. In 1993, Trek entered the stationary-exercise-bike market, but Trek authorized dealers to use “Trek” only until September 1997. In 1998, Trek began plans to re-enter the stationary-exercise-machine market but had not yet done so by 1999. Thane International, Inc. (Thane) (plaintiff) sold and developed the OrbiTrek, an elliptical stationary-exercise machine. In 1999, Thane sued for a declaratory judgment that it did not violate trademark laws concerning “Trek,” and Trek counterclaimed. The parties cross-moved for summary judgment. The district court granted Thane’s motion as to all of its claims, including lack of trademark dilution. Trek appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Berzon, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.