Thane International, Inc. v. Trek Bicycle Corp.

305 F.3d 894 (2002)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Thane International, Inc. v. Trek Bicycle Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
305 F.3d 894 (2002)

Facts

Trek Bicycle Corporation (Trek) (defendant) had manufactured bicycles under the mark “Trek” since 1977 and had used “Trek” on numerous related products, including video and computer games, toys, clothing, and helmets. Surveys published in 1995, 1997, and 1999 editions of Bicycling Magazine heralded Trek as the most popular and respected bicycle brand in the United States. Trek spent between $3 million and $5 million annually on advertising in publications that included Rolling Stone, Men’s Journal, Outside Magazine, and Playboy. Trek also sponsored athletes to use its equipment, most notably Lance Armstrong, who rode Trek bicycles to win several Tour de France titles. Pictures of Armstrong with a Trek bicycle appeared in the New York Times and on Wheaties cereal boxes. In 1993, Trek entered the stationary-exercise-bike market, but Trek authorized dealers to use “Trek” only until September 1997. In 1998, Trek began plans to re-enter the stationary-exercise-machine market but had not yet done so by 1999. Thane International, Inc. (Thane) (plaintiff) sold and developed the OrbiTrek, an elliptical stationary-exercise machine. In 1999, Thane sued for a declaratory judgment that it did not violate trademark laws concerning “Trek,” and Trek counterclaimed. The parties cross-moved for summary judgment. The district court granted Thane’s motion as to all of its claims, including lack of trademark dilution. Trek appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Berzon, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership