United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. Forman
United States Supreme Court
421 U.S. 837, 95 S.Ct. 2051, 44 L.Ed.2d 621 (1975)
- Written by Rocco Sainato, JD
Facts
United Housing Foundation (defendant) operated Co-op City, a housing project in New York City. In order to rent one of its units, potential tenants had to have an income below a certain level. Additionally, tenants were required to purchase stock in the cooperative. The stock would be repurchased by United Housing Foundation upon the tenant vacating Co-op City, at the same price that had been paid by said tenant. When United Housing Foundation attempted to raise rents in Co-Op City, the tenants (Forman) (plaintiffs) brought suit against United Housing Foundation, alleging that Forman was misled in purchasing shares of the co-op, in violation of Securities Act of 1933. The district court ruled in favor of United Housing Foundation. The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed. United Housing Foundation then petitioned for certiorari to the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Powell, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.