Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USA

317 F.3d 1097 (2003)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USA

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
317 F.3d 1097 (2003)

Facts

Vess, who was given Ritalin when he was nine years old, sued Novartis, the drug manufacturer, the American Psychiatric Association (APA) the publisher of a diagnostic manual of mental illnesses, and a nonprofit advocacy group, Children and Adults with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (CHADD) (defendants), alleging a fraudulent conspiracy to popularize the diagnosis of ADHD and the use of Ritalin to treat it. The APA and CHADD responded with motions to dismiss for Vess’s failure to meet heightened pleading standards for fraud allegations and a special motion to strike, alleging that Vess’s suit constituted a Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation suit (SLAPP), alleging injury resulting from the APA’s and CHADD’s free-speech activities. California’s anti-SLAPP statute was enacted to allow early dismissal of meritless suits attempting to chill expression through costly, time-consuming litigation. The district court determined that Vess’s suit constituted a SLAPP suit and granted the motion to strike, and it dismissed Vess’s fraud claims for failure to meet the heightened pleading requirements and failure to state a claim under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 9(b) and 12(b)(6).

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Fletcher, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership