Vincent v. Lake Erie Transportation Co.
Minnesota Supreme Court
109 Minn. 456, 124 N.W. 221 (1910)
- Written by Lauren Petersen, JD
Facts
R.C. Vincent and others (Vincent) (plaintiffs) owned a dock in Duluth. On November 27, 1905, Lake Erie Transportation Co. (Erie) (defendant) anchored its boat to Vincent’s dock to unload the cargo. A violent storm hit that prevented boats from leaving the harbor for two days. During that time, Erie deliberately kept its boat anchored to Vincent’s dock to prevent it from drifting away. It is undisputed that doing so was a reasonable exercise of ordinary care given the severity of the storm. However, strong winds repeatedly knocked the boat up against Vincent’s dock, causing damage. Vincent sued Erie to recover damages, and the jury awarded Vincent $500. Erie appealed, arguing that it cannot be held liable for the damage to the dock because it acted with due care under the circumstances.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (O’Brien, J.)
Dissent (Lewis, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.