Virgie Foy and Reffie Foy v. Bradley Greenblott

190 Cal. Rptr. 84 (1983)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Virgie Foy and Reffie Foy v. Bradley Greenblott

California Court of Appeals
190 Cal. Rptr. 84 (1983)

Facts

Virgie Foy (plaintiff), an incompetent patient with severe disabilities, was placed at San Jose Care and Guidance Center (the center) by her conservator, Santa Clara County. After giving birth to Reffie Foy (plaintiff), Virgie sued Dr. Bradley Greenblott (defendant), her treating physician, for damages related to wrongful birth. Virgie argued that the center was negligent in failing to supervise her interactions with men at the co-ed facility even though Dr. Greenblott was aware of Virgie’s “irresponsible sexual behavior.” Additionally, Virgie argued that Dr. Greenblott was negligent in not counseling Virgie on the availability of contraceptives and in discovering her pregnancy only two weeks before she gave birth. Virgie argued that an incompetent woman should never be allowed to have a child. Dr. Greenblott argued that contraceptives can be dangerous and ineffective when not used properly and that the center discovered the pregnancy at the earliest possible time. In addition, Reffie sought damages for wrongful life, arguing that he was injured as a result of being born to an incompetent mother. The lower court granted demurrer in favor of Dr. Greenblott. Virgie and Reffie appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Christian, J.)

Concurrence (Poche, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership