Virgie Foy and Reffie Foy v. Bradley Greenblott
California Court of Appeals
190 Cal. Rptr. 84 (1983)
- Written by Monica Rottermann , JD
Facts
Virgie Foy (plaintiff), an incompetent patient with severe disabilities, was placed at San Jose Care and Guidance Center (the center) by her conservator, Santa Clara County. After giving birth to Reffie Foy (plaintiff), Virgie sued Dr. Bradley Greenblott (defendant), her treating physician, for damages related to wrongful birth. Virgie argued that the center was negligent in failing to supervise her interactions with men at the co-ed facility even though Dr. Greenblott was aware of Virgie’s “irresponsible sexual behavior.” Additionally, Virgie argued that Dr. Greenblott was negligent in not counseling Virgie on the availability of contraceptives and in discovering her pregnancy only two weeks before she gave birth. Virgie argued that an incompetent woman should never be allowed to have a child. Dr. Greenblott argued that contraceptives can be dangerous and ineffective when not used properly and that the center discovered the pregnancy at the earliest possible time. In addition, Reffie sought damages for wrongful life, arguing that he was injured as a result of being born to an incompetent mother. The lower court granted demurrer in favor of Dr. Greenblott. Virgie and Reffie appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Christian, J.)
Concurrence (Poche, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.