Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Voorde Poorte v. Evans

Washington Court of Appeals
832 P.2d 105 (1992)


Facts

William and Jeanette Evans (defendants) entered into a real-estate contract to buy a mobile home from Art and Ann Voorde Poorte (plaintiffs). The terms of the agreement set a closing date of August 15, 1987 and entitled the Evanses to possession at closing. The contract further provided that the risk of loss remained on the Voorde Poortes until closing, and that in the event the property was destroyed by fire, the Evanses had the right to terminate the contract. Because the Voorde Poortes had difficulty clearing title to the mobile home, the closing was delayed. During the time before closing, the Evanses took possession. Shortly thereafter, the mobile home was destroyed by a fire due to a malfunctioning electrical appliance. The Evanses notified the Voorde Poortes of their decision to terminate the contract. The Voorde Poortes subsequently brought suit against the Evanses, alleging breach of contract. The Evanses moved for summary judgment. The trial court granted the Evanses’ motion and dismissed the Voorde Poortes’ suit. The Voorde Poortes appealed, contending that the Evanses should bear the risk of loss of the mobile home because the Evanses had taken early possession of the home without the Voorde Poortes’ knowledge or consent.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Sweeney, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.