Wallpaper Manufacturers v. Crown Wallcovering Corp.
United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
680 F.2d 755 (1982)
- Written by Jenny Perry, JD
Facts
Wallpaper Manufacturers, Ltd. (Manufacturers) (respondent), a corporation of the United Kingdom, registered the trademark “Crown” for wallpaper in the United States in 1956. Crown Wallcovering Corporation (petitioner) was a New York corporation with ties to a Canadian entity. Manufacturers apparently viewed Crown Wallcovering’s trade name in the United States as an extension of its long-term Canadian operations and did not initially object to the use of the name. However, when Crown Wallcovering began to use “Crown” as a trademark, Manufacturers took action to stop the infringing use. Crown Wallcovering responded by filing a petition to cancel Manufacturers’ registration of the trademark. Crown Wallcovering alleged that it had been using its trade name and the trademark “Crown” since 1964 in connection with the sale and distribution of wallpapers and that Manufacturers had abandoned its use of “Crown” as a trademark for wallpaper. The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (board) found that Manufacturers had abandoned the mark and granted Crown Wallcovering’s petition to cancel the registration. Manufacturers appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Nies, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.