From our private database of 14,200+ case briefs...
Walz v. Tax Commission of City of New York
United States Supreme Court
337 U.S. 664 (1970)
Walz (plaintiff) owned real estate in the city of New York. Walz filed suit in state court seeking an injunction that would prohibit the Tax Commission (defendant) from acting upon a section of the New York Constitution that conferred an exemption from property taxes upon real estate used solely for religious purposes. Walz argued that the tax exemption violated the Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses of the First Amendment. The state supreme court and court of appeals granted summary judgment for the Tax Commission. Walz petitioned the United States Supreme Court for review of the state court rulings.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Burger, J.)
Dissent (Douglas, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 237,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.