Wedner v. Fidelity Security Systems, Inc.
Pennsylvania Superior Court
307 A.2d 429 (1973)
- Written by Denise McGimsey, JD
Facts
Charles Wedner (plaintiff), the owner of a retail fur business, contracted for burglary protection services from Fidelity Security Systems, Inc. (Fidelity) (defendant). The contract included a provision limiting Fidelity’s liability for negligence or otherwise to the amount of Wedner’s annual service fee. The contract identified such amount as “liquidated damages.” Because of Fidelity’s negligence in attending to an alarm, Wedner lost $46,180 from a burglary. Wedner sued Fidelity. After a nonjury trial, the court found in favor of Wedner but awarded damages of just $312, applying the contract’s limitation of liability provision. Wedner appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Watkins, J.)
Dissent (Cercone, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.