From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.
Weintraub v. Krobatsch
Supreme Court of New Jersey
64 N.J. 445, 317 A.2d 68 (1974)
- Written by Joseph Bowman, JD
Facts
Weintraub (plaintiff) owned a house that the Krobatsches (defendants) wished to purchase. The parties entered a contract for sale of the home, which provided that Weintraub had made no representation about the condition of the home. After execution of the contract, but prior to closing, the Krobatsches entered the house to find that it was infested with roaches. Thereafter, they sought to rescind the contract. Weintraub rejected the rescission and filed an action against the Krobatsches seeking damages. The trial court granted Weintraub’s motion for summary judgment, and the Krobatsches appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Jacobs, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
