Will v. Michigan Department of State Police
United States Supreme Court
491 U.S. 58, 109 S. Ct. 2304, 105 L. Ed. 2d 45 (1989)
- Written by Salina Kennedy, JD
Facts
Ray Will (plaintiff) applied for a promotion to a data-systems-analyst position with the Michigan Department of State Police (department) (defendant) and was denied. Will alleged that the department had violated his constitutional rights by denying his application due to his brother’s activities as a student activist. Will filed suit in Michigan state court against the department and the director of state police (director) (defendant), in his official capacity, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The trial court, the appellate court, and the Michigan Supreme Court all found that, although Will’s constitutional rights had been violated, neither the department nor the director could be held liable pursuant to § 1983 because neither were persons within the meaning of the statute. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)
Dissent (Brennan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.