Williamson v. Citrix Online, LLC
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
792 F.3d 1339 (2015)
- Written by Samantha Arena, JD
Facts
Richard Williamson (plaintiff) owned a patent disclosing a method and systems for creating a “virtual classroom environment,” comprised of computers and a distributed learning server used for facilitating communication among participants. Specifically, Claim 8 of the patent described a “distributed learning control module” for receiving, transmitting, and relaying communications and coordinating system operations on a special purpose computer. Williamson sued Citrix Online, LLC (Citrix) (defendant) for infringement. Citrix contended the patent was indefinite under 35 U.S.C. §112. The district court determined that the term “distributed learning control module” was governed by § 112, paragraph 6, and found, among other things, that Claim 8 and its dependent claims were invalid. Williamson appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Linn, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.