Winget v. Winn-Dixie Store, Inc.
South Carolina Supreme Court
130 S.E.2d 363 (S.C. 1963)
Winn-Dixie Store, Inc. (Winn-Dixie) (defendant) operated a grocery store next to the property of Winget (plaintiff). The land the store was located on was properly zoned for retail use. Winget brought suit, however, claiming a nuisance in (1) the location of the store and (2) the way that the store was operated. Specifically, with respect to claim (2), Winget complained of the increased traffic in the area, the presence of crowds, the presence of trash trucks and street sweepers late at night, large air conditioning fans on the store’s roof that blew air onto Winget’s property, floodlights shining onto Winget’s property, and trash that blew from the store’s property onto Winget’s. The trial court ruled in favor of Winget on claim (2) and denied Winn-Dixie’s motion for a directed verdict. Winn-Dixie appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Lewis, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.