Woodward v. Commissioner

397 U.S. 572 (1970)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Woodward v. Commissioner

United States Supreme Court
397 U.S. 572 (1970)

Facts

Woodward and others (collectively, the majority shareholders) (plaintiffs) were majority shareholders in the Telegraph-Herald, an Iowa newspaper. When a dispute arose among the shareholders, the dissenters exercised their appraisal rights under state law and sought to require the majority shareholders to purchase the dissenters’ shares at their real value. When the parties could not agree on the value of the dissenters’ shares, the district court ordered an appraisal, for which the majority shareholders paid more than $25,000 in attorneys’, accountants’, and appraisers’ fees. The majority shareholders sought to deduct these fees under Internal Revenue Code § 212, which allowed the deduction of ordinary and necessary expenses incurred in connection with income-producing property. The commissioner of Internal Revenue (defendant) disallowed the deduction, and the majority shareholders appealed to the United States Tax Court. The tax court affirmed the commissioner, and Woodward and the majority shareholders appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, which affirmed the tax court’s denial of the deduction. The majority shareholders appealed to the United States Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership