Young Dental Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Q3 Special Products, Inc.

112 F.3d 1137 (1997)

From our private database of 46,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Young Dental Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Q3 Special Products, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
112 F.3d 1137 (1997)

Facts

Young Dental Manufacturing Company, Inc. (Young) (plaintiff) held a patent for an improved disposable prophy angle (DPA), a small dental instrument used for polishing teeth. The patent contained illustrated diagrams of the shape and structure of the DPA gears, and specified that the parts should be made of Lexan and Celcon plastics. After Young’s patent was issued, David Kraenzle (defendant) designed a similar device and secured his own patent. Kraenzle and his partner, Chris Carron (defendant), formed a company called Q3 (defendant) and began selling Kraenzle’s device. Young sued Kraenzle, Q3, and Carron for patent infringement. Q3 counterclaimed for a declaration of noninfringement and invalidity of Young’s patent, contending that the patent violated the best mode requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 112 because it failed to disclose the gear ratio and grades of plastic that the inventor believed should be used in the DPA design for best results. The jury found for Q3, and Young appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Clevenger, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 742,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,000 briefs, keyed to 986 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,000 briefs - keyed to 986 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership