In re DBSD North America

634 F.3d 79 (2011)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re DBSD North America

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
634 F.3d 79 (2011)

Play video

Facts

DBSD North America, Incorporated (DBSD) (defendant) was formed in 2004 by ICO Global Communications (ICO), which held 98.9 percent ownership of DBSD. In the process of creating a mobile communications network, DBSD acquired a significant amount of debt, which eventually proved too much to manage. In 2009, DBSD filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition, listing debts including a $40 million revolving credit facility, $640 million in convertible senior secured notes, and an unsecured claim by Sprint Nextel Corporation (Sprint) (plaintiff) which had filed a then-pending lawsuit against DBSD. The credit-facility debt was secured by a first-priority lien in DBSD’s assets. The note debt, which had grown to $740 million by the time of DBSD’s petition, was secured by a second-priority lien. Sprint’s lawsuit sought a judgment of $211 million, but the bankruptcy court temporarily valued Sprint’s claim at $2 million for voting purposes. DBSD proposed a reorganization plan in which (1) the first-lien debt would be paid off over four years, (2) the second-lien debt would be paid through shares of the reorganized entity, valued at approximately 51 to 73 percent of the original claims, (3) the holders of unsecured claims, including Sprint, would receive shares of the reorganized entity valued at approximately four to 46 percent of the original claims, and (4) ICO would receive shares and warrants in the reorganized entity. The bankruptcy court affirmed the plan over Sprint’s objection. The court held that the plan did not violate the “absolute priority rule” because the property received by ICO was being gifted to it by the second-lien holders (defendant). The district court affirmed. Sprint appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lynch, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 788,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership